It seems that Democrat Rick Noriega has a problem with Senator John Cornyn -- he represents the state of Texas the way that Texans vote.

From Noriega's new campaign video:

For the past six years, the junior senator from this state has merely represented the Administration. The other 23 million Texans need representation, too.

Well, let's consider how Texans have actually voted. In 2000, George W. Bush received 1.37 million more votes than Al Gore. In 2004, George W. Bush received 1.7 million more votes than John Kerry.

Now I don't know about you, but based upon those numbers, the people of Texas seem to have given George W. Bush a pretty decisive mandate in 2000 (59% of the vote) -- and increased that mandate in 2004 (61% of the vote). It seems pretty clear to this observer that John Cornyn has been doing precisely what we sent him to Washington to do with 55% of the vote. That is the essence of representation -- unless you are an arrogant liberal who believes that the voters are too stupid to understand who and what they are voting for, given the fact that Texans have not given a majority of their votes to a Democrat seeking the presidency since 1976.

Noriega's entire video plays to the Kos Klownz Krowd, not to real Texans.

CLOSING QUESTION FOR NORIEGA: Having attended a conference at which a member of the US military was silenced for saying that the war in Iraq is going well while wearing his uniform, how do you dare include so many pictures of yourself in your uniform while you do voice overs on political topics?

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, 123beta, Adam's Blog, Shadowscope, Nuke's News & Views, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, Cao's Blog, The Uncooperative Radio Show! Special Weekend!, Pursuing Holiness, Stop the ACLU, Faultline USA, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The World According to Carl, The Pink Flamingo, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, Right Pundits, Blue Star Chronicles, Outside the Beltway, The Pink Flamingo, Right Celebrity, Big Dog's Weblog, The World According to Carl, and Church and State, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 11:10 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 392 words, total size 5 kb.

I've entered a contest -- and I need votes for my blog entry Introducing TeachBot Mk1. If you could drop by here and vote for me (I'm entry #7), I'd appreciate the assist.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, 123beta, Adam's Blog, Shadowscope, Nuke's News & Views, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, Cao's Blog, The Uncooperative Radio Show! Special Weekend!, Pursuing Holiness, Stop the ACLU, Faultline USA, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The World According to Carl, The Pink Flamingo, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 09:49 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 3 kb.

Sorry, Matt -- Bond is just more fun than Bourne.

Hollywood star Matt Damon has dismissed James Bond as being stuck in the past.

The actor, who appears in the Bourne thrillers, said: "The Bond character will always be anchored in the 1960s and in the values of the 1960s."

The suave spy was "so anachronistic when you put it in the world we live in today", he said, but added that Bourne was no better or worse than Bond.

* * *

"Bond is an imperialist and a misogynist who kills people and laughs about it, and drinks Martinis and cracks jokes," Damon told reporters.

"Bourne is a serial monogamist whose girlfriend is dead and he does nothing but think about her."

He added that Bourne "doesn't have the support of gadgets, and he feels guilty for what he's done".

Well, Matt -- now you've identified why Bond has been a successful franchise since before I was born. He believes in what he is doing, he is unambiguously on the side of right, he's got cool stuff, and he gets the girl in the end (among other places). I'll take a weak James Bond film (such as Casino Royale, which I watched in Damon's honor last night) over Damon's Bourne flicks any day.

Posted by: Greg at 12:26 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.

But being a liberal multi-millionaire means never having to say your sorry.

As a presidential candidate, Democrat John Edwards has regularly attacked subprime lenders, particularly those that have filed foreclosure suits against victims of Hurricane Katrina. But as an investor, Mr. Edwards has ties to lenders foreclosing on Katrina victims.

The Wall Street Journal has identified 34 New Orleans homes whose owners have faced foreclosure suits from subprime-lending units of Fortress Investment Group LLC. Mr. Edwards has about $16 million invested in Fortress funds, according to a campaign aide who confirmed a more general Federal Election Commission report. Mr. Edwards worked for Fortress, a publicly held private-equity fund, from late 2005 through 2006.

So let's look at this real closely. John Edwards preaches about compassion and helping the poor -- while foreclosing on Katrina victims and profiting from their misery.

Q: Has he no shame?

A: No -- but then again, we already knew that.

H/T Captain's Quarters

Posted by: Greg at 12:18 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 2 kb.

Sponsored Post

Drug and alcohol addiction happen -- that is a sad reality of life for too many people in our society. What can you do if you or a loved one struggles with chemical dependency? You can seek help in finding proper treatment through 4Rehabilitation.com. As experts in the field of addiction, they can help you find the right program for an individual suffering from addiction, regardless of age, gender, or type of addiction.

Posted by: Greg at 11:45 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.

Well, the good news is that Jose Padilla is going away for a long time for his treasonous actions against the United States.

Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen held for 3 1/2 years as an enemy combatant, was convicted Thursday of helping Islamic extremists and plotting overseas attacks in a case that came to symbolize the Bush administration's zeal to clamp down on terrorism.

But it was hardly a complete victory for the government. When Padilla was arrested in the months following the 2001 terrorist attacks, authorities touted him as a key al-Qaida operative who planned to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb" in a U.S. city. That allegation never made it to court.

Instead, after a three-month trial and only a day and a half of deliberations, the 36-year-old Padilla and his foreign-born co-defendants were convicted of conspiracy to murder, kidnap and maim people and two counts of providing material support to terrorists.

The problem, of course, is that the dirty bomb allegations are such that they could never be raised in open court -- too much in the way of intelligence assets would be compromised in that setting. In addition, it would set the precedent that making war on the US is a criminal, not a military, matter -- undermining the Supreme Court precedent in the Quirin case, in which one of the individuals convicted by a military tribunal was an American citizen taken in America.

The major media, of course, is conflicted. They are glad to see Padilla convicted -- but want to use that conviction as a cudgel to attack our President and not our enemies.

The Washington Post is at least a bit measured.

JOSE PADILLA finally had his day in court.

After nearly five years in federal custody, Mr. Padilla and two co-defendants were convicted yesterday on three terrorism-related counts. The months of trial in South Florida were remarkable for being relatively unremarkable: Prosecutors presented evidence that Mr. Padilla, a U.S. citizen, was a member of al-Qaeda intent on using violence to advance that group's extremist goals. Defense lawyers tried to debunk those claims and offered an alternative interpretation of the evidence. A jury bought the government's case and delivered its verdict in less than 48 hours, leaving Mr. Padilla to face roughly 15 years to life behind bars, unless he prevails in an appeal.

What was extraordinary, and reprehensible, was how long Mr. Padilla had to wait for the kind of due process most Americans take for granted.

While the New York Times made it clear that George Bush and not the terrorists are who America needs to be fighting.

It is hard to disagree with the juryÂ’s guilty verdict against Jose Padilla, the accused, but never formally charged, dirty bomber. But it would be a mistake to see it as a vindication for the Bush administrationÂ’s serial abuse of the American legal system in the name of fighting terrorism.

On the way to this verdict, the government repeatedly trampled on the Constitution, and its prosecution of Mr. Padilla was so cynical and inept that the crime he was convicted of — conspiracy to commit terrorism overseas — bears no relation to the ambitious plot to wreak mass destruction inside the United States, which the Justice Department first loudly proclaimed. Even with the guilty verdict, this conviction remains a shining example of how not to prosecute terrorism cases.

Our legal system is singularly unfit to deal with terrorism cases -- just as it would have been unfit to try Hitler or Ho Chi Minh. We deploy troops, not cops, to deal with those who use (or seek to use) military force against the United States. If captured, they are to be treated as prisoners of war (if they meet the definitions of the Geneva Convention) or unlawful combatants (if they don't). In either case, it is the military that handles the problem, not the legal system. That so many folks have forgotten this basic principle is disheartening -- and shows that they really don't get the fact that we are at war.

Or maybe they think we should send NYPD to arrest bin Laden, rather than US troops to kill him.

More At Malkin, Captain's Quarters, Stop the ACLU, Pirate's Cove

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, 123beta, Adam's Blog, Shadowscope, Nuke's News & Views, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, Cao's Blog, The Uncooperative Radio Show! Special Weekend!, Pursuing Holiness, Stop the ACLU, Faultline USA, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The World According to Carl, The Pink Flamingo, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 11:24 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 787 words, total size 7 kb.

Sponsored Post

One of the first questions you have to answer when planning any sort of trip or vacation is a pretty basic one -- "Where the heck am I going to stay?" After all, you want to get yourself decent lodgings, but you don't want to drop any more cash than is strictly necessary in the process. How do you find such a place?

Well, the solution to your hunt for the perfect travel quarters is at hand. LodgingHunt.com will make your search for a hotel room a snap.

Let's say, for example, for example, that you want to visit the Grand Canyon. Simply click on the link for Arizona Lodging and you will find a list of cities and towns where LodgingHunt.com can help set you up with a great place to stay.

Now not only will you get the big chains, but you will also find smaller chains and individual hotels that the major travel services just don't bother with. What does this mean for you? A great place to stay at a good price -- and a better chance of getting a room when and where you want it.

So say you need Illinois Lodging for your business trip to Chicago, or Nevada Lodging for that Vegas getaway -- you can get them at LodgingHunt.com. And they will save you money.

Posted by: Greg at 10:43 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 231 words, total size 2 kb.

Her legal troubles marred the early months of her father's presidency. Now her marriage may be the highlight of the waning months of the Bush Administration.

Jenna Bush is getting married.

Is a White House wedding in the works? Jenna Bush, one of President Bush's twin daughters, is engaged to be married to her longtime boyfriend, Henry Hager, the White House announced Thursday.

Asked if the two were getting married in the Rose Garden, Sally McDonough, press secretary for first lady Laura Bush, replied: "They have not set any details, date or place."

Jenna Bush, 25, and Hager, 29, were engaged Wednesday in Maine, she said.

The two have been dating for several years, and Hager is often seen at Jenna Bush's side at Bush family functions and formal events, such as a White House dinner in November 2005 in honor of Britain's Prince Charles and his wife, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall.

Here's hoping that America can put all partisanship aside and wish this young couple nothing but happiness.

But I would like to comment on what may be the most absurd and disrespectful attempt to take a shot at the President -- courtesy, of course, of the New York Times.

President Bush, who has been the sole male in his nuclear family with the exception, perhaps, of his dog Barney, will finally have a son-in-law.

WTF? That sort of lede really has no place in a story of this sort.

On the other hand, The Washington Post scored points with me with the anecdote they used to start this story.

Back in February 2005, Laura Bush was asked about the guy her daughter Jenna was seeing. "This is not a serious boyfriend -- I hate to have to be the one to say it on television," said the first lady. "But he's a very nice young man."

And one not easily dissuaded. Henry Hager proposed marriage to Jenna on Wednesday in Maine. She said yes.

Maybe I just a sucker for silly courtship stories. Or maybe it is the fact that my mother-in-law still has the letter in which my wife offers a not so flattering commentary on me after our first meeting -- two weeks before we began dating and fourteen months before our wedding. Persistence pays off.

Posted by: Greg at 10:09 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 386 words, total size 3 kb.

Sponsored Post

Looking to spiff up your home's windows with new blinds? How would you like to get them for free?

Yea, you read that right -- you can Shop for Free Window Blinds at FreeBlinds.com!

Here's how it works. You buy your blinds. You pass your referral code to others. You get a rebate or 20% of all purchase from your referral code until you reach the cost of your order. The result? Free blinds for you! more...

Posted by: Greg at 06:22 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 757 words, total size 5 kb.

Let's be honest here -- some pretty lousy things have happened in just about every society since the beginning of civilization. However, do people alive today bear some moral responsibility for the actions of their ancestors? Do they have a moral responsibility to apologize for those actions? To make some recompense for them?

I've long argued that the answer is no. Two stories today illustrate how absurd such apologies can be.

For the first story, let's go to Papua New Guinea.

THE descendants of Papua New Guinea cannibals who killed and ate four Fijian missionaries in 1878 have apologised.

Fiji's High Commissioner to PNG, Ratu Isoa Tikoca accepted the apologies at a reconciliation ceremony near Rabaul in PNG's East New Britain Province yesterday in front of thousands of people.

"We at this juncture are deeply touched and wish you the greatest joy of forgiveness as we finally end this record disagreement," Ratu Tikoca said.

PNG's Governor-General Paulias Matane told the crowd he appreciated the work of the early Fijian missionaries in spreading Christianity in the islands region.

The ceremony marked 132 years since Methodist ministers and teachers from Fiji arrived in the New Guinea islands region in 1875 headed by Englishman George Brown.

In April 1878, a Fijian minister and three teachers were killed and eaten by Tolai tribespeople on the Gazelle Peninsula.

Brown directed and took part in a punitive expedition that resulted in a number of Tolais being killed and several villages burnt down.

His actions caused a storm of protest in the Methodist Church.

Official investigations by British colonial authorities in the Pacific cleared him of criminal charges.

I'll be the first to accept the notion that contrition and repentance are good things. However, doesn't it seem rather bizarre for non-cannibals to apologize for having ancestors who were cannibals? These people bear no responsibility for the crimes or sins (and let's not discuss in this context whether cannibalism was either) of their ancestors. For what are they apologizing? Their mere descent from these people? I think the headline of the article catches the craziness of it all -- Sorry we ate your forefathers. Nobody apologizing did any such thing.

And then you get into even older historical disputes.

MORE than 1200 years ago hordes of bloodthirsty Viking raiders descended on Ireland, pillaging monasteries and massacring the inhabitants.

On Wednesday, one of their more mild-mannered descendants stepped ashore to apologise.

The Danish Minister for Culture, Brian Mikkelson, who was in Dublin to celebrate the arrival of a replica Norse longboat, apologised for the invasion and destruction inflicted.

"In Denmark we are certainly proud of this ship but we are not proud of the damage to the people of Ireland that followed in the footsteps of the Vikings," Mr Mikkelson declared in his welcoming speech delivered by the River Liffey.

"But the warmth and friendliness with which you greet us today and the Viking ship show us that, luckily, it has all been forgiven."

Good grief! We are talking about things that happened over a millennium ago! It is how the world was at the time, a much less civilized place. Warfare and raiding were an accepted part of Scandinavian culture (Irish, too -- thought they tended to do it more among themselves ). Why apologize for it?

What next? Will the Greek ambassador to Turkey make a visit to Hisarlik and formally apologize for the actions of Agamemnon, Achilles, and Odysseus during the Trojan War?

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, Jeanette's Celebrity Corner, Right Truth, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Thoughts, Public Domain Clip Art, , Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Right Celebrity, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 11:24 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 651 words, total size 6 kb.

You sure as hell don't speak for this Republican -- and I'm one that was elected to my position by Republican voters, not hand-picked by the President.

The Republican Party's national chairman scolded his party's two top presidential candidates this week for their tough stance on illegal immigration, even as both men moved to try to one-up each other in calling for stricter enforcement.

Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida, President Bush's handpicked choice for party chairman, chided former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani for opposing and mischaracterizing the Senate immigration bill Mr. Martinez helped craft.

"It's about leading on the tough issues," Mr. Martinez told the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce in comments first reported in yesterday's St. Petersburg Times. "It was easy to say, 'This wasn't good enough, this isn't right, I don't agree with Martinez.' ... But at the end of the day, what is your answer? How would you solve this?"

How? By doing what the American people want done.

Round 'em up! Ship 'em back! Rawhide!

And we can start with this one.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, Jeanette's Celebrity Corner, Right Truth, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Thoughts, Public Domain Clip Art, , Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Right Celebrity, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 07:52 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 3 kb.

But don't these judges know that New Orleans is the Chocolate City, so ordinary rules about racist employment practices don't apply? Good Lord -- this is Louisiana! One can't expect honesty from elected Democrats in that state!

The New Orleans district attorney lost his fight Wednesday against a ruling that said he violated the civil rights of dozens of white employees when he fired them after taking office in 2003 and replaced them with black workers.

Orleans Parish prosecutor Eddie Jordan claimed he filled key positions with political supporters and did not discriminate based on race when he took over from longtime District Attorney Harry Connick Sr. in 2003; he fired 53 of 77 employees.

In his appeal, Jordan had argued that jurors did not have enough evidence to reach that conclusion in 2005.

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict that, with interest, means Jordan's office owes the ex-workers and their attorneys about $3.5 million.

In addition to rejecting all points of Jordan's appeal, the panel also ordered U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval Jr. to set attorney fees to cover the appeal for the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs attorney Clement Donelon estimated that would add another $80,000 to $100,000 to the judgment.

All of the fired employees, with the exception of one who was Hispanic, were white. The jury found that 43 had been the victims of racial discrimination by Jordan, who is black, and awarded damages to 35 of them, Donelon said.

Jordan was a US Attorney under Bill Clinton.

Posted by: Greg at 06:17 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.

Oh, really?

Democrats seeking the White House have received more than four times as much money from some of the nation's wealthiest enclaves as party contenders did in 2003, an analysis of campaign-finance records shows.

The major Democratic presidential candidates have raised nearly $32 million from the 50 ZIP codes that were the top sources of campaign money in the first six months of the year, the non-profit Center for Responsive Politics found. In contrast, Republicans received $13.8 million.

The analysis for USA TODAY shows Democrats raised the most money in 43 of the 50 postal codes. New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is the top recipient in 28 areas.

In the first half of 2003, John Kerry, Howard Dean and other Democrats who ran for president raised about $7.7 million from the top 50 donor ZIP codes. President Bush, who did not actively raise money until May of that year, collected nearly $6 million in that period.

The trend in giving from such upscale areas as Greenwich, Conn., is another sign of the financial advantage for the 2008 election enjoyed by Democrats, who have outraised their Republican counterparts by nearly $60 million.

"There's a lot of pent-up demand by Democrats to win back the White House," said John Green, a political scientist at the University of Akron in Ohio.

Because fewer than 1% of all Americans donate to presidential campaigns, the contributions from tony neighborhoods also highlight the influence that a tiny fraction of people will have on the contest.

"In some ways, this 2008 primary season won't be decided in the heartland or the swing states, but in Upper East Side apartments, Beverly Hills mansions and Palm Beach villas," center spokesman Massie Ritsch said. The analysis also found:

•Donors living in New York's 10021 ZIP code rank first, providing more than $4.5 million. That's up from $1.2 million in the first six months of 2003, when the area also was the top source of presidential money.

Clinton received the most, $1.4 million, followed by former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Republican, with $941,000.

Investment banker Jewelle Bickford, who gave $4,600 to the former first lady, said Clinton's Senate and White House experience make her the best candidate to cope with the Iraq war: "My support for her is totally pragmatic."

•Areas trying to boost native sons have emerged as top money sources. Donations to Illinois Sen. Barack Obama made Chicago's Gold Coast area No. 17 on the list. The 60610 ZIP code didn't make the list in 2003.

Neither did Paradise Valley, Ariz., where Arizona Sen. John McCain was its top recipient with $275,000.

"It takes more money to run for president," said developer John Graham, who donated $4,600 to McCain. "Everyone has ratcheted up their efforts to help."

•Three of the seven ZIP codes where Republicans have raised the most money are in Texas. Giuliani, a partner in a Houston-based law firm, was the leading recipient in all three.

•Some areas with close ties to Bush are no longer top sources of donations. Among them: North Dallas, where Bush lived before he was elected governor of Texas.

Seems to me that the Democrats are actually the party of the rich and over-privileged. Wouldn't it be great if this money actually went to helping the poor, like Democrats CLAIM they want to do, rather than subsidizing multi-millionaires with no contact with the wants and needs of average Americans as they seek to seize power?

But then again, why would it -- these folks in the wealthiest zip codes are giving to those exactly like themselves. And the only individual who has a clue as to the problems besetting the poor is Hillary -- after all, she has lived in government housing for much of her adult life.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, Jeanette's Celebrity Corner, Right Truth, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Thoughts, Public Domain Clip Art, , Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Right Celebrity, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 04:34 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 699 words, total size 6 kb.

The MuNuvians are in the middle of a change of servers at this time, which may be contributing to some bugs and glitches as things get tweaked. Please forgive the technical issues that may arise -- and don't give up on me if the blog is temporarily unavailable.

In addition, in the near future I will be making some changes around here as the MuNuvians migrate to a new blogging platform. I hope you will approve.

Posted by: Greg at 04:25 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.

Even if I didn't know folks involved with this mission (and being under 5 miles from JSC, it would be hard not to know someone involved in it), I'd recognize that this decision is one with no room for error. That's why I'm surprised by this report.

Experiments conducted last night at NASAÂ’s Johnson Space Center in Houston indicated that temperatures inside a gouge on the underside of the space shuttle Endeavour were not likely to become dangerously hot during reentry.

Coupled with computer simulations that also indicated that the shuttleÂ’s aluminum frame would stay under 350 degrees Fahrenheit, mission managers may decide today to forgo any type of repair and allow Endeavour to fly home as is.

Officials have decided to delay a decision an extra day while analysis of the data continues.

Realizing that I am not a scientist, nor am I familiar with the data in question, I would hope that the final decision would be to add a space walk and make the repairs. NASA can ill-afford to lose the life of this brave crew, nor can it afford the damage that models indicate could occur without the repairs. Better to play it safe and preserve the space program than risk the loss of support that either of those two outcomes would likely cause.

Posted by: Greg at 02:24 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 1 kb.

My heart aches for those who die under tragic circumstances and their survivors. However, I'm troubled by a new trend that has developed in recent years -- the notion that the victims of such tragedies (or their families) are entitled to compensation from the government.

Virginia Tech will offer the families of the 32 students and faculty members slain by Seung Hui Cho a one-time payment of $180,000 from a fund created to receive private donations in the weeks after the April 16 massacre, the administrator of the Hokie Spirit Memorial Fund said Wednesday.

The administrator, Kenneth R. Feinberg of Bethesda, said the university plans to distribute the entire $7.1 million fund to the families of those killed and to the 27 people wounded in Norris Hall.

Those who were wounded will receive $40,000 to $90,000 apiece, depending on the severity of their injuries, as well as free tuition at Virginia Tech.

"We are hopeful this effort can continue the healing process for those most grievously touched by the April 16 tragedy," said Virginia Tech President Charles W. Steger.

Some slain students' relatives, who plan to meet this weekend, appeared unimpressed by Feinberg's decision on distribution of the fund.

"It was expected. We've got to take a look at it and decide if there is going to be a response or not," said Joseph Samaha of Centreville, whose daughter Reema was killed in Norris Hall.

Now the charitable response to this tragedy was touching, and the desire of so many folks to help was admirable. But the families involved want more. And that is a response that troubles me deeply.

Why, exactly, does the state of Virginia owe the victims anything? Can the state of Virginia really be said to be responsible for the acts of a madman? I simply do not believe that it is. And the mere fact that the state has deep pockets is not a sufficient cause to demand compensation.

Posted by: Greg at 02:00 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 330 words, total size 2 kb.

Back in college, there was this kid in one of my classes who could have been a twin for Sanjaya from American Idol. Man, was he ever sold on the benefits of "self-hypnosis" for purposes of self-improvement. I laughed then, but over two decades later he is the guy I remember.

Even 25 years later, I still think back to that presentation in class when I see stuff about this site for hypnosis downloadshypnosis downloads to help improve people's lives -- all available over the internet or on CD. Frankly, I'm astounded by the number of hypnosis downloads available. I guess that it indicates there are lots of people who find these programs beneficial, just like my classmate. You can find hypnosis downloads for memory improvement, skill development, ending destructive personal habits, or even to help cope with pain. There are all sorts of possibilities for you.

And even better, the folks at Instant-Hypnosis.com really want you to try their material. They offer fantastic discounts for you! And since all sessions come with a money-back guarantee, you do not pay a thing for any session with which you are not completely satisfied. That, my friends, is a sign of confidence in one's product, being prepared to give up every penny with the assurance that one's customers will be happy enough to stay with the program in the future!

Posted by: Greg at 01:51 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 229 words, total size 2 kb.

I've got serious questions about the man's character, but I do like what he has to say on this issue.

In a sweeping repudiation of the conventional wisdom that America's war on terrorism must address Palestinian Arab national grievances, the leading Republican contender for the presidency is warning of the dangers of pressing too soon for Palestinian statehood and is asserting that Israeli security is a "permanent feature of our foreign policy."

"Too much emphasis has been placed on brokering negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians Â-- negotiations that bring up the same issues again and again," Mayor Giuliani writes in an essay published yesterday in Foreign Affairs. "It is not in the interest of the United States, at a time when it is being threatened by Islamist terrorists, to assist the creation of another state that will support terrorism."

In some of the boldest language on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict used thus far by any presidential candidate, Mr. Giuliani writes: "Palestinian statehood will have to be earned through sustained good governance, a clear commitment to fighting terrorism, and a willingness to live in peace with Israel."

That language appears to be a direct shot at President Bush and Secretary of State Rice, who are making just such a push for final status negotiations between President Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert in September, despite Hamas's takeover of Gaza in June.

And Rudy is dead right on this one. The creation of a Terrorstinian state would be fundamentally destabilizing to the region, and undermine the security of the one truly free nation there. Furthermore, any argument over whether or not Israel "should have been" created is a moot point -- the Jewish presence in the region has been increasing for over a century, and after sixty years the Israelis are not going to go anywhere. Any attempt to make them do so would inexorably result in a new Masada.

Am I an uncritical supporter of Israel? No, I am not. but any American policy in the Middle East that undermines Israel is not in America's best interests -- and at a time when we are fighting forces of radicalism that tend to create instability in the Middle East, we should not be creating a new state to serve as a home for such radicalism.

Posted by: Greg at 01:47 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 389 words, total size 2 kb.

Tell me -- which party's views does this more accurately reflect?

According to a 1963 U.S. News & World Report story, President Kennedy said, "I don't think we can undo the past. In fact, the past is going to be with us for a good many years in uneducated men and women who lost their chance for a decent education. We have to do the best we can now. That is what we are trying to do. I don't think quotas are a good idea. I think it is a mistake to begin to assign quotas on the basis of religion or race -- color -- nationality. . . . On the other hand, I do think that we ought to make an effort to give a fair chance to everyone who is qualified -- not through a quota -- but just look over our employment rolls, look over our areas where we are hiring people and at least make sure we are giving everyone a fair chance. But not hard and fast quotas. . . . We are too mixed, this society of ours, to begin to divide ourselves on the basis of race or color."

Expansion of opportunity and opposition to quotas. I believe that his words could be substituted for the current language in the GOP platform and made no difference -- but these same words uttered by a Republican today would be labeled as racist by Democrats.

Posted by: Greg at 01:31 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 1 kb.

Sponsored Post

Let's be honest -- finding a good host for your website can be a challenge. After all, what should you look for? Is the size of the host a big deal? Is price your overriding factor? Is your focus bandwidth and reliability? It is hard to know where to begin.

Well, for seven years the folks at Wing Six have been providing outstanding internet and web hosting services to consumers in the Chicago area and beyond. That is an accomplishment in and of itself, because many hosting companies have been bought up by competitors or have disappeared. Others have become impersonal behemoths who have forgotten that every customer is important. Web Six hasn't done either.

In fact, the thing that is most surprising about Wing Six is that their customers like them -- they really like them (sorry -- I was channeling Sally Field for a moment). All you have to do is read the comments made about some other web site hosting companies to know that isn't always the case. Why is Wing Six different from the rest? Because they believe in First Class Hosting Done Right.

And if you need blog hosting, Wing Six has lots of experience hosting blogs and offers great service for you.

Best of all is that Wing Six also offers a fantastic reseller hosting package that can allow you to have your cake and eat it, too. Sign up a few other bloggers at a reasonable rate and you can defray the cost of running your own blog in the process. Best of all, Wing Six keeps everything up and running for you and your clients, so there is no hassle involved. What more can you ask for?

So if you are looking for someone to do your web hosting, look at Wing Six. You won't be sorry.

Posted by: Greg at 06:30 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.

First, they wanted to take away a worker's right to a secret ballot.

Now they want to require that employers recognize unions that represent only a minority of employees.

Seven labor unions asked the National Labor Relations Board yesterday to order employers to bargain with unions, even when the unions represent only a minority of employees.

This would be a sharp departure from current practices, in which employers are required to bargain with a union only after it shows that a majority of employees at a workplace support it.

The unions hope that such a change will make it easier to unionize workers. Today, 7.4 percent of private-sector workers belong to unions, less than a fourth of the rate in the 1950s.

Frankly, this notion is absurd. To require an employer to have different wage scales and benefit packages depending on union membership is unreasonable. And that is exactly what the result would eventually be -- because the next step for the unions is to demand not only negotiations, but binding arbitration or mediation with the employers.

Indeed, the entire notion that an employer has an obligation to bargain with a union at all is absurd -- after all, why shouldn't a business be able to look for the best value for his dollar by picking a different supplier? If he can do this with raw materials, he should also be permitted to do this with labor.

Posted by: Greg at 05:03 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.

This is, dare I say it, among the most pathetic things I have ever heard of.

In the last few months, bottled water — generally considered a benign, even beneficial, product — has been increasingly portrayed as an environmental villain by city leaders, activist groups and the media. The argument centers not on water, but oil. It takes 1.5 million barrels a year just to make the plastic water bottles Americans use, according to the Earth Policy Institute in Washington, plus countless barrels to transport it from as far as Fiji and refrigerate it. ...

Dave Byers, 65, from Silver Spring, Md., discussed the issue with his wife, Pat, on the steps of the Metropolitan Museum of Art on a 90-degree Saturday. “I think it should be banned, actually,” he said of bottled water.

Now, according to to this piece at Reason's Hit & Run blog, we use 20 million barrels of oil a day.

And if we take accepted figures that water bottles make up a whopping .02% of our oil consumption and plastic bags consume .16% of our oil, that makes up les than two-tenths of one percent of our oil consumption.

Assuming such bans would not require shifting to products that would consume any of the oil saved (a brainless assumption -- but hey, let's humor the acolytes of the cult of man-made global warming), that means our daily oil savings would be a whole 36 thousand barrels of oil a day -- or a bit over 13.1 million barrels of oil a year. In other words, the savings is less than 2/3 of one day's oil consumption. The total savings would have been consumed by the American public by 3:47 PM on January 1.

Yeah. Great job, folks.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary's Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, Big Dog's Weblog, Right Truth, Nuke's News & Views, Webloggin, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, Pursuing Holiness, Right Celebrity, third world county, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Planck's Constant, The Pink Flamingo, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 04:50 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 369 words, total size 4 kb.

Well, looks like Don Imus is making all the right steps to get himself back on the air.

First, he settles with CBS.

The voice of Don Imus could resurface somewhere on the radio dial as soon as this fall, after Mr. Imus and CBS announced that they had settled the remaining differences about his firing in April over remarks deemed insensitive to women and blacks.

Neither Martin Garbus, the lawyer representing the radio host, nor CBS, which owns WFAN, the AM station that had been the flagship for his morning talk show, would comment on the terms of their agreement, citing a confidentiality clause. Mr. Imus was due to be paid nearly $40 million over the almost four years that remained on his contract.

While some Imus associates suggested yesterday that his final payment was at least $20 million, Karen Mateo, a spokeswoman for CBS Radio, characterized that figure as too high.

Now he is trying to get hired somewhere else.

Because so much of the radio spectrum has been carved up by conglomerates, the list of broadcasters that could offer Mr. Imus the possibility of a flagship in New York, as well as a syndicated network of affiliates, is relatively short. There is Citadel Broadcasting, which owns WABC-AM in New York, but to install Mr. Imus in the morning, it would have to bump “Curtis and Kuby,” a relatively popular talk show. Steve Borneman, president and general manager of WABC, said yesterday that he was happy with “Curtis and Kuby” and that neither he nor anyone else at his company had spoken with Mr. Imus or his representatives.

Another possibility is Clear Channel, but many of its New York stations also have popular morning shows, including WLTW-FM, a light music outlet that is among the most lucrative in the nation, and WHTZ-FM, better known as Z100, which plays pop music.

WOR, an AM station in New York owned by Buckley Broadcasting, is also a possibility. But like any other potential employer, WOR would have to support the salary that Mr. Imus is seeking, believed to be in the range of $8 million or more a year.

Personally, I look for him to end up on a satellite gig like Howard Stern.

But this doesn't end the legal issues for Imus.

Don Imus is facing his first lawsuit from a player on the Rutgers Women's Basketball team for derogatory comments that cost him his job as a radio host in April, ABC News has learned.

Kia Vaughn, star center for the Rutgers Women's Basketball team, has filed a lawsuit against Imus for libel, slander and defamation -- the first civil suit to be filed against the former radio host. Vaughn is asking for monetary damages of an unspecified amount.

"This is a lawsuit in order to restore the good name and reputation of my client, Kia Vaughn," said her attorney, Richard Ancowitz, in an exclusive interview with the ABC News Law & Justice Unit.

The suit names Imus individually, but it is also waged against MSNBC, NBC Universal, CBS Radio, CBS Corp., Viacom Inc., Westwood One Radio and Imus producer Bernard McGuirk.

Today's suit refers to terms used by Imus April 4 -- including referring to women on the team as "nappy headed" -- as "debasing, demeaning, humiliating, and denigrating" to Vaughn and her fellow players. "There's no way these bigoted remarks should have seen the light of day," Ancowitz told ABC News.

"Don Imus referred to my client as an unchaste woman. That was and is a lie."

I don't see this case as having any real merit.

First, given the ubiquitous nature of the word "ho" in contemporary culture in contexts not referring to prostitution, I don't know that there would be a showing that Imus actually impugned the young lady's morality.

Second, given the public support Vaughn and her teammates received from the American public, I don't believe she can actually show damages.

Third, given that the statements were made the day after she appeared in the national championship game, it could reasonably be argued that Vaughn was a public figure, requiring her to meet a higher burden in any libel, slander, or defamation action under the doctrine enunciated by the Supreme Court in the Sullivan case back in the 1960s.

If Imus is smart, however, he will quickly approach Vaughn and her teammates and settle this case quickly --because it is the decent thing to do and would indicate some sort of contrition on his part.

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary's Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, Big Dog's Weblog, Right Truth, Nuke's News & Views, Webloggin, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, Pursuing Holiness, Right Celebrity, third world county, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Planck's Constant, The Pink Flamingo, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 03:57 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 818 words, total size 7 kb.

There really is no debate in my eyes. The basic argument is spelled out in the opening paragraph.

Over the strong objection of federal safety officials, a quiet movement to lower the legal drinking age to 18 is taking root as advocates argue that teenagers who are allowed to vote and fight for their country should also be able to enjoy a beer or two.

Forget the statistics and the arguments about alcoholism and drunk driving. When we are telling ADULTS that they are responsible enough to enter a binding contract, marry, fight, and vote, but not to drink a beer, we have crossed the line into absurdity.

Besides, I this argument is really a dangerous one.

James C. Fell, a former federal highway safety administrator who is a senior researcher on alcohol policy with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, acknowledged that “it’s not a perfect law. It doesn’t totally prevent underage drinking.”

But Fell said the age restriction “does save lives. We have the evidence.”

But if that is the case, why stop at 21? Why not raise the drinking age still higher -- 25, perhaps, or maybe even 30? After all, that would make it still harder for young people to get alcohol, and cut down (in theory) on alcohol abuse and deaths among those who are younger and less responsible. Heck, why not raise the drinking age to 50, and cut the fatalities still further?

Well, because of what we know from the Prohibition era. Prohibition does not really work. Treating adults like children will only lead to contempt for the law and its massive violation.

Sort of like what the statistics show with the current drinking age laws.

The federal governmentÂ’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health found that in 2005, the most recent year for which complete figures are available, 85 percent of 20-year-old Americans reported that they had used alcohol.

Yeah -- really effective. What these laws have done is made 85% of our young people into criminals -- and bred contempt for the law in general.
But in my mind, it all comes back to the initial argument-- and absurdities like the one that I see going on now in my own neighborhood.

A kid on the block is in boot camp, having just graduated from high school in May. He's getting married when he finishes basic training in a couple of weeks. He and his new wife are going to buy a house that her grandmother owns (he is in the reserves). They can do all of these things without parental permission.

But at their wedding reception, their parents will need to be present for them to be allowed to have their champagne toast.

Where is the logic in that?

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary's Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, Big Dog's Weblog, Right Truth, Nuke's News & Views, Webloggin, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, Pursuing Holiness, Right Celebrity, third world county, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Planck's Constant, The Pink Flamingo, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 02:43 AM | Comments (254) | Add Comment
Post contains 532 words, total size 5 kb.

Sponsored Post

There is just something about handmade portraits that cannot be duplicated by a photograph. Seriously -- whether we are talking about portraits in oil, charcoal, or watercolor, there is a human dimension to the artwork that has a soul in a way that the product of a camera cannot capture.

PaintYourLife.com is a bridge between the two forms of art. They can take your photograph and turn it into a hand-crafted work of art -- an oil painting, a watercolor, charcoal sketch, or pencil drawing. Thin about it -- you can take that well-loved photo of you and your spouse and have it become that once-in-a-lifetime anniversary gifts for your spouse. You will be doing nothing short of creating a family heirloom that will be passed down through the generations.

Of course, PaintYourLife.com does not limit itself to people. If you are like my wife and I, you may have a very special pet who has become an integral part of your life. Preserve that faithful companion in portrait form. All you need is a favorite photo and they will do the rest.

Now one of the nice things about PaintYourLife.com is that their works of art are all crated by hand. A real artist will translate your photo into a unique work of art -- not a computer generated print like some services. Furthermore, they guarantee your satisfaction with the finished product, and will work with you until you are happy with the final portrait.

Posted by: Greg at 02:30 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.

The Bush Administration is about to designate Iranian President Mahmoud the Mad's Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization. Its about time.

Formed in 1979 and originally tasked with protecting the world's only modern theocracy, the Revolutionary Guard took the lead in battling Iraq during the bloody Iran-Iraq war waged from 1980 to 1988. The Guard, also known as the Pasdaran, has since become a powerful political and economic force in Iran. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad rose through the ranks of the Revolutionary Guard and came to power with support from its network of veterans. Its leaders are linked to many mainstream businesses in Iran.

"They are heavily involved in everything from pharmaceuticals to telecommunications and pipelines -- even the new Imam Khomeini Airport and a great deal of smuggling," said Ray Takeyh of the Council on Foreign Relations. "Many of the front companies engaged in procuring nuclear technology are owned and run by the Revolutionary Guards. They're developing along the lines of the Chinese military, which is involved in many business enterprises. It's a huge business conglomeration."

The Revolutionary Guard Corps -- with its own navy, air force, ground forces and special forces units -- is a rival to Iran's conventional troops. Its naval forces abducted 15 British sailors and marines this spring, sparking an international crisis, and its special forces armed Lebanon's Hezbollah with missiles used against Israel in the 2006 war. The corps also plays a key role in Iran's military industries, including the attempted acquisition of nuclear weapons and surface-to-surface missiles, according to Anthony H. Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The Clintonoids at the Center for American Progress are complaining that this move might make Iran less cooperative with international efforts to rein-in its bad behavior.

The administration's move could hurt diplomatic efforts, some analysts said. "It would greatly complicate our efforts to solve the nuclear issue," said Joseph Cirincione, a nuclear proliferation expert at the Center for American Progress. "It would tie an end to Iran's nuclear program to an end to its support of allies in Hezbollah and Hamas. The only way you could get a nuclear deal is as part of a grand bargain, which at this point is completely out of reach."

Such sanctions can work only alongside diplomatic efforts, Cirincione added.

"Sanctions can serve as a prod, but they have very rarely forced a country to capitulate or collapse," he said. "All of us want to back Iran into a corner, but we want to give them a way out, too. [The designation] will convince many in Iran's elite that there's no point in talking with us and that the only thing that will satisfy us is regime change."

In other words, expect the Left to advocate capitulating to this terrorist group as well as al-Qaeda.

Posted by: Greg at 02:23 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 474 words, total size 3 kb.

Sponsored Post

In the nineteenth century, it used to be the custom for guests to take a bit of the wedding cake home with them in a box. That was the "wedding favor" of the day. Well, with today's wedding receptions now long festive events with lots of eating and partying, that doesn't cut it -- the cake is consumed at the wedding itself.

Instead, newly married couples give out all manner of interesting little trinkets, knick-knacks, and other wedding favors to their guests.

Frankly, the number of items available is shocking. LittleThingsFavors.com, for example, has over 2600 different wedding favors available -- everything from candles and decorative soaps to photo frames, glasses, and more! And to celebrate the opening of their greatly expanded website, they are offering a 10% discount on orders over $50.00 (just use the coupon code "grandopening") and free shipping to anyplace n the 48 contiguous states and Canada via UPS Ground.

What can you get? Well, for starters, there are personalized Hershey's Miniatures and Kisses. You can also find place card holders, bath accessories and a whole host of personalized favors for your wedding guests.

Given our wedding colors, I suspect that these lavender roses would have ended up on every plate at our reception 12 years ago had they been available at the time -- they would have matched the lavender and purple roses in my bride's wedding bouquet.

Posted by: Greg at 01:27 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.

And we are under a tropical storm watch.

A tropical depression in the central Gulf of Mexico is churning toward South Texas today, its bands of thunderstorms expected to dump heavy rain in southeast Texas and along other parts of the coast beginning tonight, forecasters said.

Given that we are a foot ahead of normal in rainfall totals, it will be interesting to see where the water goes.

Posted by: Greg at 01:21 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.

Sponsored Post

What refrigerator door is complete without them? And if you look in my kitchen, the fridge is covered with Business Card Magnets and other promotional magnets.

Let's see -- we've got one for the dentist, one for the doctor, and one for each of my wife's specialists. There is also the dog groomer, the vet, the pharmacy, a couple of favorite restaurants. . . well, you get the idea. I've even got one listing the phone numbers of all the administrators from my school AND the SubFinder line.

Why are these magnets so great? Because when I need the phone numbers for these essential folks, I know right were to find them to make the call. And yes, they also promote brand loyalty.

Posted by: Greg at 06:07 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 1 kb.

After all -- if the country is in relatively good shape and the Surge is working, how can they run on a platform condemning the party and president that presided over all this good news?

How do you make a Cambridge liberal cry? Tell him some good news.

Mention the amazing state of the American economy - low unemployment, rising wages and record-setting per-household wealth - and heÂ’ll angrily fling his $4 bottle of Fiji in your face.

Show her the new NASA numbers debunking the “it’s the hottest decade on record” panic, and she’ll kick you with rain forest footwear.

Quote USA Today’s report that large al-Qaeda style attacks in Iraq are down nearly 50 percent since the troop surge began, and he may punch you with a “Peace Now” bumper sticker.

You wonÂ’t read it on the front of the Boston Globe-Democrat, and you sure wonÂ’t hear it from cranky Keith Olbermann, but there is actually good news in the world. And itÂ’s putting the left in a foul mood.

Take Karl RoveÂ’s resignation. After years of demanding the Evil GeniusÂ’ head on a pike, the Bush-bashers are finally getting a Rove-free White House. HeÂ’s leaving Washington, his reputation in tatters. Great news for the left - and theyÂ’re miserable about it.

The answer, of course, is simple -- good news for America is bad news for a party that needs things in America to suck in order to achieve success. It is why, for example, one local blogger who leads a major Democrat organization here in Houston spends much of his time arguing how bad life is here in Texas -- even as our population is growing and our economy is booming. Why? because anything else would call into question the notion that the Democrats have anything to offer the state or the nation.

It must suck to have to tear down your state and nation in order to grab hold of political power.

Posted by: Greg at 01:51 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 343 words, total size 2 kb.

And the argument here could clearly be used to enable the prosecution of those who leak national security secrets to papers like the New York Times and Washington Post.

Five reporters must testify about their law enforcement sources in a former Army scientistÂ’s lawsuit against the Justice Department, a federal judge in Washington ruled yesterday.

The suit, filed by Steven J. Hatfill, a bioterrorism expert, contends that the government violated the federal Privacy Act by providing journalists with information about him in the F.B.I.Â’s investigation of the deadly anthrax mailings in 2001.

The reporters — Michael Isikoff and Daniel Klaidman of Newsweek; Allan Lengel of The Washington Post; Toni Locy, formerly of USA Today; and James Stewart, formerly of CBS News — have acknowledged receiving information from the Justice Department and the F.B.I. about Dr. Hatfill, the judge, Reggie B. Walton, wrote in his decision yesterday. But they have refused to name their sources.

Judge Walton, of the Federal District Court in Washington, said Dr. Hatfill was entitled to the sources’ names because “the information sought is clearly central to his Privacy Act claims.”

“Denying civil litigants access to the identity of government officials who have allegedly leaked information to reporters would effectively leave Privacy Act violations immune from judicial condemnation,” Judge Walton wrote, “while leaving potential leakers virtually undeterred from engaging in such misbehavior.”

Look at the quote from Judge Walton's ruling. It is no great logical leap to argue that denying federal prosecutors access to the identity of government officials who have allegedly leaked information to reporters would effectively leave Espionage Act violations immune from judicial condemnation while leaving potential leakers undeterred from engaging in such misbehavior.

We as a nation have to decide upon a simple question -- are journalists (however broadly or narrowly you want to define that term) subject to the same laws and obligations as other Americans? If they are, the notion of a press shield or a reporter's privilege undermines such a principle. A reporter with special knowledge of a crime must be obligated to cooperate with authorities -- and if, as journalists claim, that hinders their ability to get a story because folks are deterred from breaking the law, that is a positive impact of that practice.

A different take at Michelle Malkin & Captain Ed

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary's Thoughts, Adam's Blog, Big Dog's Weblog, Inside the Northwest Territory, Nuke's News & Views, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Amboy Times, The Florida Masochist, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Public Domain Clip Art, Pursuing Holiness, Conservative Thoughts, third world county, Faultline USA, Wake Up America, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, 4 Time Father?, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Planck's Constant, Gone Hollywood, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 01:33 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 483 words, total size 6 kb.

Because, like it or not, it is the central front of the Crusade Against Jihadism.

Christopher Hitchens goes to great length to explain why al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia is important, and why defeating/discrediting these enemies of all mankind is so important. Crushing arguments that AQM is unimportant, Hitchens concludes:

If I am right about this, an enormous prize is within our reach. We can not only deny the clones of Bin Ladenism a military victory in Iraq, we can also discredit them in the process and in the eyes (and with the help) of a Muslim people who have seen them up close. We can do this, moreover, in a keystone state of the Arab world that guards a chokepoint—the Gulf—in the global economy. As with the case of Afghanistan—where several provinces are currently on a knife-edge between an elected government that at least tries for schools and vaccinations, and the forces of uttermost darkness that seek to negate such things—the struggle will take all our nerve and all our intelligence. But who can argue that it is not the same battle in both cases, and who dares to say that it is not worth fighting?

Indeed -- only those without the vision to understand that the forces of jihad are one common enemy.

Posted by: Greg at 01:05 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 1 kb.

Karl Rove is leaving, but Condi will remain at the State Department.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice wants to continue serving President George W. Bush until he leaves the White House, her spokesman said Monday after Bush's top aide Karl Rove resigned.

"The basic question is: Is she planning on sticking around? The answer to that question is, 'yes,'" State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.

With Rove's resignation as deputy White House chief of staff announced Monday, Rice and Vice President Dick Cheney are among the last of the remaining top officials with Bush since he first took office in 2001.

Rice became secretary of state in 2005 at the start of Bush's second term in office after being his national security advisor since January 2001.

She had not been spared criticism for her role in prosecuting the unpopular Iraq war, which has taken the lives of 3,684 American soldiers since the March 2003 invasion.

McCormack said that while Rice and other cabinet officials "serve at the pleasure of the president," the top US diplomat has "got a lot on the agenda" for the next 17 months, including grappling with the Iraq war, the Israel-Palestine question as well as the North Korean and Iranian nuclear issues.

"And she has a lot that she wants to accomplish on behalf of this president, on behalf of the American people," he said.

She's hoping to head back to Stanford in 2009.

But I wonder -- might we see the Secretary of State resign next fall to be the GOP Vice Presidential candidate? Or is this the signal that she will not accept such an offer?

Posted by: Greg at 12:57 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.

Sponsored Post

I've always liked promotional mugs from different businesses that I've dealt with. Back during college, I made it something of a hobby of mine to scoop one up when I had the chance. I think I had a promotional mugs from every local radio station as well as political candidates of my party lined up along the edges of my bookshelves.

Needless to say, all those promotional mugs made my room the place to have a cup of coffee, cocoa or tea...

Posted by: Greg at 12:14 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.

Here's the headline.

Private Paddling Club Faces Congressional Ire

Fix in your mind what you believe the story may be about.

Now read the story.
more...

Posted by: Greg at 11:53 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 259 words, total size 4 kb.

Sponsored Post

Being multi-lingual is becoming a necessity in many professional fields these days. As a teacher, I have found a working knowledge of Spanish to be invaluable, and wish I knew more. Those language skills are important for me to do my job effectively

In business, the need to be able to communicate with one's clients is critical. Foreign language classes are therefore quite important for those regularly involved in international transactions. After all, how can you communicate with that client if you do do not share a common language? How do you build that rapport that is so critical in a business relationship?

Saint George International has been providing language coursework for businesses and organizations in the UK for 40 years and has become a well-respected source for business language education. Their 1-on-1 program can be arranged on a schedule and location convenient for th client -- and is offered for those seeking to learn Spanish, French, German, and Italian. They also offer Dutch tuition London, Dutch courses London and other programs in Dutch.

If you work in an international setting, SGI may provide you with the language skills you need to be a csuccess.

Posted by: Greg at 06:27 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 200 words, total size 1 kb.

Speaking as a history teacher, I have a startling confession -- I hate Black History Month. Hispanic History Month, too. Ditto all the other special months that "celebrate" homosexuals, disabled individuals, women, Asians and the oppressed minority du jour.

I also hate special days and weeks for different groups. I'm also not particularly fond of Constitution Day and the federal mandate imposed upon me as an educator to teach about the Constitution on a given day in September.

Does that make me a bigot? Does it mean I hate everyone but for white men? No to both questions.

Instead, it means that I have a problem with agenda-driven history and curricula. And while I don't like the reasons for dropping the designations of special months in the Philadelphia School District, I do like the result.

Consider what I teach -- World History. Now this may come as a surprise to some of you, but history is generally taught in a somewhat linear fashion due to the shocking reality that time itself is linear in nature. As a result, I find it somewhat absurd to drop a less on on the Constitution in the middle of my unit on the early river valley civilizations. Similarly, Dr. King and the civil rights movement really fit better in May when I deal with the contemporary era of history, not back in February during the French Revolution. And as for the noted (alleged and presumed) homosexuals of history, I gladly deal with them in their respective historical context.

In a history classroom, content should not be balkanized in the name of promoting pride. I may have to deviate from a strict chronology from time to time (I deal with Alexander the Great before the Roman Republic because he fits better in the context of Greek Civilization before I chart the rise of Rome, which I concede began over a century before the Macedonian conqueror's death), but a chronological approach does make sense in a subject built, in large part, on chronology.

More to the point, the history of each and every one of these groups is the common heritage of all humanity. Properly taught, history provides us lessons on the common struggles and triumphs of various people's around the world, leading to the global society in which we live. Decontextualizing these groups and their achievements undercuts that message, no matter how much the advocates of these groups claim otherwise.

"It is appalling that a school district would drop months that recognize and educate our school children about the history and contributions of America's diverse fabric," said Malcolm Lazin, executive director of the homosexual advocacy group Equality Forum, in a news release.

"GLBT History Month is important for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) students and for the mainstream community," he said. "The GLBT community is uniquely disadvantaged because it does not learn its history at home or in public schools.

"It is important for young people to have role models, know their history, and take pride in the national and international contributions of their community," Lazin said.

I'm sorry, but that is dead wrong -- the diversity of the fabric is only seen when the threads are blended together to create the whole, while unraveling those threads destroys the fabric. These "separate but equal" months and celebrations, like "separate but equal" schools, do an injustice to our students and sow division, not unity.

Posted by: Greg at 09:50 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 579 words, total size 4 kb.

This one is put in the context of Guantanamo Bay, but I think there is a broader context to consider.

Is it ethical for a doctor to force-feed a prisoner on a hunger strike? An opinion piece in the Aug. 1 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association suggests doctors should refuse to force-feed detainees at Guantánamo Bay as long as the prisoners are capable of making rational choices. This month Dr. S. Ward Casscells, the new assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs, went to Guantánamo to "look at it with my own eyes," he told NEWSWEEK. Of the 355 detainees still in Gitmo, about 20 are on hunger strike at any one time, he says. Prisoners who skip nine straight meals go under "observation"; the forced feeding usually begins when they dip 15 percent beneath their ideal weight. (Overeating is actually a problem at Gitmo; Casscells says many prisoners take drugs for diabetes and high cholesterol.)

Now the information about Gitmo prisoners is interesting, but not relevant here. The bigger question is what we should do, as a society, about hunger strikers.

My answer? Let them starve -- to death, if necessary.

And I don't just say that in regard to Gitmo terrorists -- I also mean that in regard to these folks.

Seriously -- if someone is going to threaten to go on a hunger strike, we should expect them to take it to the limit. No food, no water, no supplements. Indeed, it is morally incumbent for us to not interfere with their "courageous moral stand" to "speak truth to power" . Furthermore, we as a society should ridicule and despise anyone who quits a hunger strike short of receiving the goal for which they began it. After all, a three or four day fast is not a hunger strike, and neither is a "no solid food but I'll take smoothies and ice cream" demonstration like Cindy Sheehan did a while back.

Hunger strikes are supposed to be a non-violent demonstration of one's willingness to die for what one believes in. Claiming to be on a hunger strike while having anything short of such a commitment is simply publicity-seeking self-aggrandizement that merits contempt -- and outside interference with such an act of self-sacrifice is meddling with a fundamental right to individual autonomy.

Posted by: Greg at 08:59 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 398 words, total size 3 kb.

The New York Times is nothing if not consistent in its inconsistency.

Five weeks ago, the New York Times insisted that the US must leave Iraq immediately, despite the potential for chaos and bloodshed.

It is time for the United States to leave Iraq, without any more delay than the Pentagon needs to organize an orderly exit.

Today, on the other hand, the New York Times insists that the chaos that would follow a US withdrawal is reason enough to stay in Iraq -- and to keep troop levels high.

The United States cannot walk away from the new international terrorist front it created in Iraq. It will need to keep sufficient forces and staging points in the region to strike effectively against terrorist sanctuaries there or a Qaeda bid to hijack control of a strife-torn Iraq.

But there should be no illusions about trying to continue the war on a reduced scale. It is folly to expect a smaller American force to do in a short time what a much larger force could not do over a very long time. ThatÂ’s exactly what the British are now trying to do. And the results are painfully plain to see.

Now wait just a minute -- In July you said that such chaos was no reason to stay, and it was a part o the reason for leaving. Now you say it is the reason to stay? Why the reversal?

Oh, and the editors give a signal about how little the New York Times values our troops. They make it quite clear that they believe the US has failed in Iraq -- but insist that more American soldier must die to continue that "failed mission". I wonder -- will they ever consider giving success a chance? Well, perhaps the wind will have changed to that direction by September.

More At NewsBusters and Don Surber

Open Trackbacking At Right Pundits, Perri Nelson's Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Committees of Correspondence, Mark My Words, Rosemary's Thoughts, Right Truth, DragonLady's World, The Pet Haven Blog, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, third world county, Wake Up America, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Wyvern dreams, Dumb Ox Daily News, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 04:44 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 4 kb.

Hillary Clinton may get the nomination from the Democrats, but is she an asset to other Democrats seeking office? Many think not.

Looking past the presidential nomination fight, Democratic leaders quietly fret that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton at the top of their 2008 ticket could hurt candidates at the bottom.

They say the former first lady may be too polarizing for much of the country. She could jeopardize the party's standing with independent voters and give Republicans who otherwise might stay home on Election Day a reason to vote, they worry.

In more than 40 interviews, Democratic candidates, consultants and party chairs from every region pointed to internal polls that give Clinton strikingly high unfavorable ratings in places with key congressional and state races.

"I'm not sure it would be fatal in Indiana, but she would be a drag" on many candidates, said Democratic state Rep. Dave Crooks of Washington, Ind.

Unlike Crooks, most Democratic leaders agreed to talk frankly about Clinton's political coattails only if they remained anonymous, fearing reprisals from the New York senator's campaign. They all expressed admiration for Clinton, and some said they would publicly support her fierce fight for the nomination _ despite privately held fears.

The chairman of a Midwest state party called Clinton a nightmare for congressional and state legislative candidates.

A Democratic congressman from the West, locked in a close re-election fight, said Clinton is the Democratic candidate most likely to cost him his seat.

A strategist with close ties to leaders in Congress said Democratic Senate candidates in competitive races would be strongly urged to distance themselves from Clinton.

"The argument with Hillary right now in some of these red states is she's so damn unpopular," said Andy Arnold, chairman of the Greenville, S.C., Democratic Party. "I think Hillary is someone who could drive folks on the other side out to vote who otherwise wouldn't."

"Republicans are upset with their candidates," Arnold added, "but she will make up for that by essentially scaring folks to the polls."

And let's be honest here -- as polarizing as the President has been during his presidency, both Bill and Hillary Clinton have the same sort of effect. There is no candidate that the Democrats could nominate who would fire-up the GOP base to work against the Democrats -- and turn away independent voters in GOP-leaning states.

I really hope she gets the nomination.

Posted by: Greg at 03:34 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 407 words, total size 3 kb.